Insights

Real-Time and post-interaction QA: Why you need both

We hear it all the time: “If I’m already doing QA after the call, why would I need it during the call too?” 

It’s a fair question, particularly for teams already stretched thin and trying to avoid tech overload. But the answer is actually quite simple: Real-Time QA and Post-Interaction QA solve different problems. 

And the most forward-thinking contact centers aren’t choosing between them – they’re combining them to cover more ground, reduce risk faster, and coach more effectively. 

Here’s why both matter, and what each one brings to the table. 

What’s the difference between post-interaction and real-time QA? 

Post-Interaction QA 

This is the traditional approach. After a conversation, a QA analyst or team leader reviews the interaction, scores it, and shares feedback – usually days later. It’s essential for understanding patterns, surfacing coaching themes, and ensuring long-term consistency. 

Real-Time QA 

Real-time QA happens during the conversation. A live scorecard monitors key quality factors (like tone, sentiment, missing compliance steps, or CX risks) and flags issues as they occur. Agents are therefore able to affect change and address any missed line-items while on the call. 

Pro tip: think of it like this… 

If QA was driving, this is how it’d compare: 

• Real-Time QA is the lane-keep assist: nudging you back on track before you veer off course. 

• Post-Interaction QA is the mechanic: looking under the hood, spotting deeper issues, and recommending long-term fixes. 

You need both to drive safely and efficiently. 

What Real-Time QA delivers that post-interaction can’t 

1. Speed 

If something goes wrong on a call – a missed ID&V check, a moment of frustration, or poor tone – the agent and the team leader know instantly. No waiting. No backlog. 

2. Risk visibility 

Real-Time QA gives leaders early warning on customer dissatisfaction, compliance risks, or service gaps –  before it shows up in CSAT or complaints. 

3. Efficiency 

With real-time scores and automated wrap notes, teams can enjoy significant time-savings – focusing only on the conversations likely to yield the best insights.  

What post-interaction QA still does best 

Real-time can’t do everything (and it’s not trying to). You still need post-interaction QA to: 

• Dive deeper into soft skills and complex issues 

• Calibrate across evaluators and teams 

• Review nuance and tone in long-form conversations 

• Deliver structured, strategic coaching 

• Track long-term improvement trends 

Think of post-interaction QA as your strategic lens, while real-time is your tactical radar. 

What a blended approach looks like in practice 

Let’s say an agent forgets to verify a customer’s identity on a call. With post-call QA, you’d find out days later. With Real-Time QA: 

• The issue is flagged instantly 

• The agent is prompted to verify before the call ends 

• Compliance risk is reduced — in the moment 

Post-interaction QA means the call can still be reviewed in more detail later; identifying whether it’s a pattern, and if ongoing coaching is needed. 

You probably already have post-call QA in some form. Adding Real-Time QA isn’t about replacing it – it’s about augmenting your coverage, speeding up improvement, and giving agents feedback they can act on. 

It doesn’t need to be a heavy lift. Real-Time QA can run quietly alongside your existing workflows, no disruption, just more visibility and value. 

Discover how 1^st Central is using Real-Time QA to spot issues faster, reduce after-call work, and help agents improve with less pressure in the video below. 

Select to open video modal